Megyn Kelly Says an Angry Robert De Niro Is Not Going to Get Biden to Beat Trump | Video
The ongoing political drama between Hollywood and the White House has again surfaced in the public sphere, this time with Robert De Niro’s outspoken criticism of Donald Trump juxtaposed against the backdrop of a significant trial.
Megyn Kelly, former prime-time anchor at Fox, expressed skepticism about the impact of De Niro’s comments on the political landscape, especially given past events.
The Echoes of 2016
During a recent episode of « The Megyn Kelly Show, » Kelly recalled an exclusive segment from her Fox News days featuring Robert De Niro’s fervent political declarations. « It was the first time he’d really come out and said how he felt about politics, » Kelly noted, reflecting on the 2016 election where De Niro’s efforts did not sway the outcome in favor of Hillary Clinton.
Despite the actor’s passionate critique, Kelly questioned the effectiveness of De Niro’s renewed attempts to influence political opinions against Donald Trump, especially in a landscape that has seen significant shifts since 2016.
A Strategic Misstep?
Further complicating the narrative, De Niro’s recent comments were made during a press conference outside a courthouse, amid the closing stages of Trump’s hush money trial. The actor took this opportunity to vehemently criticize Trump, suggesting he poses a danger not just to the city or the country, but to the world at large. « He wants to sow total chaos, » De Niro stated, emphasizing the gravity of his concerns.
Kelly criticized the decision to have January 6th police officers, known for their political stances, accompany De Niro at the press event. She argued that their presence only highlighted the partisan nature of the criticism, which might detract from its intended impact.
The Role of Celebrity in Politics
This episode raises broader questions about the role of celebrities in political advocacy. While De Niro’s comments resonate with certain segments of the public, the efficacy of such interventions in actually swaying political outcomes remains debatable.